References are helpful when they show more than just a robot behind a safety fence. What matters are the task, component, process environment, interfaces, and the result that needs to be achieved in day-to-day production.
That’s why the reference section separates three perspectives: the path through a project, concrete applications across different industries, and the optimization of existing plants and processes.
Choose the entry point that is closest to your current task setup.
Capture requirements, engineering, integration, commissioning, acceptance, and production start-up.
Real tasks from different industries, with suitable robot types and processes.
Analyze existing facilities, separate causes, and improve them in a targeted, technical way.
A robust automation project doesn’t come from choosing a robot alone. Process capture, feasibility, design, programming, safety, and integration must be aligned with each other.
The project page shows which decisions are made in which phase and how technical results are verifiably secured.
Components, hygiene, cycle time, reach, payload, and process risk determine which robot, gripper, and system setup make sense.
The examples range from automotive and metalworking to food and plastics, as well as medical technology, logistics, electronics, and woodworking.
Not every weakness requires a new system. Often, the most effective levers are in the gripper, fixture, robot path, sensor technology, software, or material supply.
That’s why process optimization starts with a clear separation of symptoms, causes, and a sensible course of action.
The examples provide guidance. The reliable solution is created from your real-world constraints.
Describe processes, components, variants, and current bottlenecks.
Define cycle time, quality, availability, and operation together.
Technically compare suitable project and application examples.
Set feasibility, an on-site appointment, or the concept phase in a sensible way.
The examples make visible the robot type, task, environment, and typical integration questions.
Performance, cycle time, and cost-effectiveness only become reliable once your process data is considered.
Describe the component, the sequence of steps, and the goal. AROBIS assigns which experiences and technical approaches can be transferred.
Clear answers to classify examples and to assess how transferable they are to your project.
Customer names and sensitive production data are published only with explicit approval. That is why the examples focus on technically relevant tasks and solution principles.
No. The examples illustrate typical tasks. Grippers, fixtures, safety, software, and interfaces are designed for the real process.
Often, principles can be carried over. However, a reliable statement requires components, cycle time, variants, the environment, and the available interfaces.
A short process description, images or videos, part data, the desired cycle time, and known issues or quality requirements are helpful.
Yes. Existing systems can be analyzed, optimized, extended, or technically modernized.
AROBIS clarifies the task, requests additional data if needed, and recommends the appropriate next step.